What kind of person are you looking for?

These lists group people by how they appear in a filing. Political subjects, lobbyists, and reference candidates are kept separate.

Browse every person profile A–Z

What would you like to compare?

Choose a question below. Support, opposition, reporting breadth, and record counts are shown separately—not combined into one score.

Narrow the people comparison

Search published names or choose the filing classification. The figure and exact table keep support and opposition separate from payments to the person.

1010 matching people

How often do people appear in these records?

Support and opposition are shown separately in the exact table. Neither one means money was paid to the person.

People named in support and opposition records

Compare the highest-ranked people in the current filtered directory while keeping filing classifications separate from payments.

CRUZ, RAFAEL EDWARD TED is named in the most distinct records in this comparison: 417 support, 7 opposition, and 7 without either classification.

Data through September 13, 2026

The visual summary requires JavaScript. The exact values and evidence remain available below.

Exact political-position record counts. Opposition is negative only in the visual layout.
PersonAll distinct recordsSupportOppositionOther or unclassifiedVisual
CRUZ, RAFAEL EDWARD TED 431 417 7 7 Shown
CASEY, ROBERT P. JR. 382 179 203 0 Shown
MORENO, BERNIE 321 320 0 1 Shown
EVANS, TIMOTHY GABRIEL JOSEPH 315 17 275 23 Shown
SCOTT, RICK SEN 315 314 0 1 Shown
BROWN, SHERROD 303 57 246 0 Shown
HARRIS, KAMALA 286 285 1 0 Shown
CHAN, CONNIE 259 257 2 0 Shown
BORES, ALEXANDER 219 164 55 0 Shown
SHEEHY, TIM 207 201 0 6 Shown
PERRY, SCOTT 200 138 57 5 Table only
MCCORMICK, DAVE 186 185 0 1 Table only
MOORE, FELIX BARRY 186 183 1 2 Table only
TESTER, R. JON 178 21 157 0 Table only
HAGERTY, BILL 169 144 0 25 Table only
COLLINS, SUSAN M. 168 136 9 23 Table only
MEALER, ALEXANDRA 165 151 14 0 Table only
MOODY, ASHLEY 161 118 7 36 Table only
CRANE, ELI 140 131 7 2 Table only
MARSHALL, ROGER W 137 121 0 16 Table only
PAXTON, WARREN KENNETH JR. 130 74 56 0 Table only
BEGICH, NICHOLAS III 128 104 0 24 Table only
MORRIS, NATE 127 62 65 0 Table only
VAN EPPS, MATTHEW ROBERT 126 95 31 0 Table only
SCHMITT, ERIC 122 113 0 9 Table only
How to interpret this visual
  • This comparison is bounded to the first 25 entries in all entries in the current comparison; narrow the filters to inspect another part of the population.
  • Opposition extends left only to create the diverging layout; the exact table keeps every count positive.
  • Records without a support or opposition classification remain in the exact table and are not plotted as zero.
  • Support and opposition describe the filing's political association, not a payment to the person.
  • A missing side or person means no matching record was found in this page scope, not a verified zero.
  • The chart is capped at 10 entries; the exact table retains 15 additional entries.
Open help for this page

Help with this page

Choose a topic without losing your place.

Coverage and limits

Partial data coverage. The current data includes FARA DOJ FARA structured registry, FEC FEC candidate summary, FEC FEC committee summary, FEC FEC Form 3L, FEC Schedule A, FEC Schedule B operating expenditures, FEC Schedule E, LDA 1A, 1T, 2A, 2T, 3A, 3T, 4A, 4T, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, RA, and RR, and LDA MM, MA, YY, and YA for cycles 1900, 1937, 1942, 1943, 1944, 1945, 1946, 1947, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1953, 1954, 1955, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1960, 1961, 1962, 1963, 1964, 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1973, 1974, 1975, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026, with observed data through September 13, 2026. Coverage is partial; a missing record is not a verified zero.

Review the exact data coverage

What a missing result means

No matching record means none was found inside the currently included sources and dates. It is not evidence that no contribution, spending, lobbying, or other activity occurred.